Abstrakt
In this chapter, Shpet looks at Steinthal, who views psychology as the explanatory science among the human sciences. For Shpet, Steinthal's position requires us to clarify just what a psychological interpretation is. Through it, we can hope to obtain a more precise answer to just what is special about a historical interpretation as a distinctive type of interpretation. Shpet here also elaborates on the views of philologists after Boeckh who tended to identify their discipline with history, such as Droysen and Bernheim.
Publication details
Published in:
Špet Gustav (2019) Hermeneutics and its problems: with selected essays in phenomenology. Dordrecht, Springer.
Seiten: 99-115
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98941-9_7
Referenz:
(2019) [Hermeneutical moments of historical methodology], In: Hermeneutics and its problems, Dordrecht, Springer, 99–115.