Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(1999) Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4).
As a contribution towards clearing the ground for a new phenomenological evaluation of the essence of science, in this paper I present a critique of Heidegger's argument in Being and Time for the priority of Zuhandenheit to Vorhandenheit. I argue that Heidegger's notion of presence-at-hand is incoherent, conflating Husserl and Descartes, and that this general analysis has serious phenomenological flaws. Contrary to Heidegger, I maintain that there is a form of exploratory, theoretical activity including causal inquiry which is prior to the type of practical activity entailed by readiness-to-hand. Consideration of this exploratory activity points us in the direction of an alternate conception of the genesis and essence of theory.
Publication details
Full citation:
Soffer, G. (1999). Phenomenologizing with a hammer: theory or practice?. Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4), pp. 379-393.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.