Ilkka Niiniluoto
(2020). Truthlikeness: old and new debates. Synthese, 197 (4), 1581-1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01975-z.
(2017). Eino Kaila and the vienna circle. In F. Stadler, N. Weidtmann & S. Pihlström (eds.) Logical empiricism and pragmatism (pp. 185-199). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2017). Optimistic realism about scientific progress. Synthese, 194 (9), 3291-3309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0974-z.
(2017). Verisimilitude: why and how. In N. Bar Am & S. Gattei (eds.) Encouraging openness (pp. 71-79). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2014). Against relative truth. In K. Mulligan & T. Placek (eds.) The history and philosophy of Polish logic (pp. 141-159). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2013). On the philosophy of applied social sciences. In H. Andersen, D. Dieks, T. Uebel, W. J. González & G. Wheeler (eds.) New challenges to philosophy of science (pp. 265-274). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2010). Kaila's critique of vitalism. In J. Manninen & F. Stadler (eds.) The Vienna circle in the Nordic countries (pp. 125-134). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2010). Theory change, truthlikeness, and belief revision. In M. Surez, M. Dorato & M. Rédei (eds.) Epsa epistemology and methodology of science (pp. 189-199). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2004). Induction. In I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen & J. Woleński (eds.) Handbook of epistemology (pp. 521-545). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2004). Truth-seeking by abduction. In F. Stadler (ed.) Induction and deduction in the sciences (pp. 57-82). Dordrecht: Springer.
with Sintonen Matti, Woleński Jan (eds) (2004). Handbook of epistemology. Dordrecht: Springer.
(2003). Carnap on truth. In T. Bonk (ed.) Language, truth and knowledge (pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2003). Content and likeness definitions of truthlikeness. In J. Hintikka, T. Czarnecki, T. Placek & A. Rojszczak (eds.) Philosophy and logic in search of the Polish tradition (pp. 27-35). Dordrecht: Springer.
(1999). Theories of truth: Vienna, Berlin, and Warsaw. In J. Woleński & E. Köhler (eds.) Alfred Tarski and the Vienna circle (pp. 17-26). Dordrecht: Springer.
(1998). Induction and probability in the Lvov-Warsaw school. In K. Kijania-Placek & J. Woleński (eds.) The Lvov-Warsaw school and contemporary philosophy (pp. 323-335). Dordrecht: Springer.
(1996). The relativism question in feminist epistemology. In L. Hankinson Nelson & J. Nelson (eds.) Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science (pp. 139-157). Dordrecht: Springer.
(1994). Hintikka and Whewell on Aristotelian induction. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 49, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.5840/gps1994/95494.
(1994). Truthlikeness misapplied: a reply to Ernest W. Adams. Synthese, 101 (2), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064021.
(1991). Realism, relativism, and constructivism. Synthese, 89 (1), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413803.
(1988). From possibility to probability: British discussions on modality in the nineteenth century. In S. Knuuttila (ed.) Modern modalities (pp. 275-309). Dordrecht: Springer.
(1984). Is science progressive?. Dordrecht: Springer.
(1982). Statistical explanation. In G. Fløistad (ed.) La philosophie contemporaine / Contemporary philosophy (pp. 157-187). Dordrecht: Springer.
(1979). Knowing that one sees. In E. Saarinen, R. Hilpinen, I. Niiniluoto & M. Provence Hintikka (eds.) Essays in honour of Jaakko Hintikka (pp. 249-282). Dordrecht: Springer.
with Saarinen Esa, Hilpinen Risto, Hintikka Jaakko (eds) (1979). Essays in honour of Jaakko Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel.
with Saarinen Esa, Hilpinen Risto, Provence Hintikka Merrill (eds) (1979). Essays in honour of Jaakko Hintikka. Dordrecht: Springer.
(1976). Inductive explanation, propensity, and action. In J. Manninen & R. Tuomela (eds.) Essays on explanation and understanding (pp. 335-368). Dordrecht: Springer.