235878

(2011) Synthese 183 (3).

Mechanisms revisited

James Woodward

pp. 409-427

This paper defends an interventionist treatment of mechanisms and contrasts this with Waskan (forthcoming). Interventionism embodies a difference-making conception of causation. I contrast such conceptions with geometrical/mechanical or “actualist” conceptions, associating Waskan’s proposals with the latter. It is argued that geometrical/mechanical conceptions of causation cannot replace difference-making conceptions in characterizing the behavior of mechanisms, but that some of the intuitions behind the geometrical/mechanical approach can be captured by thinking in terms of spatio-temporally organized difference-making information.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-011-9870-3

Full citation:

Woodward, J. (2011). Mechanisms revisited. Synthese 183 (3), pp. 409-427.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.