From a pragmatist's point of view

George Herbert Mead's unattributed review of Theodore Merz's a history of European thought in the nineteenth century

Ernest G. Rigney , Timothy C. Lundy

In 1914, on the eve of the Great War, the eminent scholar and polymath, Theodore Merz, published what would be the final volume of his magisterial history of nineteenth-century European thought. A belated review of this volume appeared in the April 1918 issue of the American Historical Review. This particular review, though favorable, was inexplicably unsigned. Our paper offers compelling evidence that the author of this unsigned review was George H. Mead, the pragmatist philosopher from the University of Chicago. The paper is organized in the following fashion. First, several types of documentary evidence are cited in support of the claim that Mead authored the unsigned review. Second, content analysis is used to identify themes in the review that reflect the distinctive intellectual concerns of Mead. One such concern was the ability of research-based science to address and rectify problematic aspects of social life. The concluding section of the paper reprints in its entirety Mead’s 1918 review.

Publication details

DOI: 10.4000/ejpap.383

Full citation:

Rigney, E. G. , Lundy, T. C. (2015). From a pragmatist's point of view: George Herbert Mead's unattributed review of Theodore Merz's a history of European thought in the nineteenth century. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 7 (1), pp. n/a.

This document is available at an external location. Please follow the link below. Hold the CTRL button to open the link in a new window.