Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2005) Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3).
Bickle argues for both a narrow causal reductionism, and a broader ontological-explanatory reductionism. The former is more successful than the latter. I argue that the central and unsolved problem in Bickle's approach to reductionism involves the nature of psychological terms. Investigating why the broader reductionism fails indicates ways in which phenomenology remains more than a handmaiden of neuroscience.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11097-005-4069-z
Full citation:
Jacobson, A. J. (2005). Is the brain a memory box?. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3), pp. 271-278.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.